It is suggested that this article needs to be merged with Featherlite Coaches. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 21:37, 3 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
- Yes, and it would be normal to merge into the newer company that now owns it unless the earlier one is much better known. Is that the case here? DGG ( talk ) 16:53, 8 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
- I agree. There's not enough material in this article to establish notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG as it stands. -- HighKing++ 14:37, 18 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
- It appears that Amadas took the Featherlite name in 2008 since it was better known.[[1]]. I've not seen any coverage of Amadas since. This should probably be a redirect to Featherlite Coaches. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 00:49, 19 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
- This looks complicated. The Featherlite Coaches website itself currently lists the owner as Amadas instustries, an older company which doesn't have a Wikipedia page. There seems to be an entity described as the Amadas group (which may be synonymous with Amadas industries) which owns (relatively silently) both Amadas coaches and Featherlite coaches. I'd be more comfortable not merging until the relationship between the companies is clearer. Klbrain (talk) 09:12, 4 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
