Talk:Am486

Learn more about this page

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[CPU cache#Details of operation|Write-Back]] The anchor (#Details of operation) has been deleted by other users before.
[[CPU cache#Details of operation|Write-Through cache strategy]] The anchor (#Details of operation) has been deleted by other users before.
[[CPU cache#Details of operation|Write-Back cache strategy]] The anchor (#Details of operation) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

untitled

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I ran a small computer shop in the 1993-1996 time period; I'm curious that the AMD 496DX-50, 486DX2-100, and 486DX4-160 aren't mentioned. I've still got my -160 machine around for DOS applications that simply will not run in an emulator.````

I had an AMD 486-DXdontknowanymore 133 overclocked to 160 and it worked like a charm. 87.142.221.18 (talk) 03:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic