Talk:AltLaw

Bearian 17:56, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Darn, beat me to it

You created your page one minute before I created AltLaw.org. I'll ask for a speedy delete, but I'd like to suggest we change the name of this page to AltLaw.org as I believe that is the correct name. Agreed? Ronnotel 19:08, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Note - for now, I have just reverted a premature name change - AltLaw.org must be speedy deleted before we can change the name of this article. Ronnotel 19:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

I must respectfully disagree

Because the name of the actual project is AltLaw (the press as well as the project's creators refer to it as such) - altlaw.org is the URL of its page (part of it, at least). Perhaps a better solution would be to have the AltLaw.org entry point to the AltLaw entry? Atypeoferror 19:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

yes, you're right - I guess I saw it labeled differently at a blog post. Looking around the site it does look like they are branded as AltLaw. Sounds fine. Ronnotel 19:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

This is Tim Wu, one of the creators. We do call it Altlaw, and sometimes "project Altlaw." Thanks for setting up this page. If you have any questions just ask. 71.247.209.34 05:40, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Tim, thanks for your comments. Would you happen to have a photograph or an image that would be suitable for the article and that you would be willing to release into the public domain? Hard to say exactly what that would be - perhaps something that shows the cases being digitized? If so, then go ahead and upload the image but it would be better if you let an editor not aligned with AltLaw actually add it to the article. Ronnotel 12:29, 24 August 2007 (UTC)