Wikipedia

Talk:Alstom Citadis/Archive 1

< Talk:Alstom Citadis
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Archive 1

Melbourne

Is it true that only the Melbourne versions have that stupid clicking thing that drivers click to keep the track brakes off?203.214.75.127 January 2006 (UTC)

If you mean a big red push-button, I'm sorry to tell you that no. In fact, this is a safety device (Dead Man Device) installed to ensure the driver is aware. To do so, this device blocks traction and applies brakes if the driver does not send a signal (push the button)within a given interval (few seconds) In other types of rail transport you might find a similar device installed as a pedal with the same function. It's annoying for all, but prevents the train/tram to run driverless. Dretsend

Morocco - Tramway de Rabat-Salé

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Two tramway lines are being built in Rabat, Morocco. In 2007 Alstom won the tender for the supply of rolling stock (citadis). Operation will start before the end of 2010 according to the press. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.165.233.175 (talk) 01:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed Citadis Projects

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Subiaco, Western Australia

There is a proposal to re-introduce trams on Rokeby Road (Trams ran from 1900 to 1958) and Citadis is a contender, due to their presence in Melbourne.

See Post Newspapers article

Thoglette (talk) 12:49, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

File:Istanbul - Turkey Alstom Citadis X-04.jpg Nominated for Deletion

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  An image used in this article, File:Istanbul - Turkey Alstom Citadis X-04.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Istanbul - Turkey Alstom Citadis X-04.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:32, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Dublin lines

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The table in article states:

Country City Image Type Fleet numbers No. Year Length (m) Width (m) Comments
  Ireland Dublin 301 3001 - 3026 26 2003–2004 40 2.40 Red line, in 2007 extended from 30 to 40 m
  Ireland Dublin 401 4001 - 4014 14 2003–2004 40 2.40 Red line (transferred from green line 2010)
  Ireland Dublin   402 5001 - 5026 26 2009 43 Green line

But the photo in the last row shows a tram of a red line. You can see clearly the photo was made on Seán Heuston Bridge (and Heuston Station in the background), which makes it the Red line.

Any thoughts onwhy this picture is there? Were trams on Red Line transferred to green line? There's no information about it. Thanks, Hołek ҉ 09:00, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

The picture is dated 2005, so it is clearly a Citadis 301/401 type. It's put in the wrong row when it is shown as a Citadis 402 type. (although I understand that the design hasn't changed and even Alstom hasn't updated the Dublin Citadis reference photo[1]). Guidod (talk) 10:20, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ http://www.alstom.com/uk/projects/transport/dublin-citadis-tram/

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/mullhouse/
    Triggered by \brailway-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 13:16, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Train type determination: bidirectional or monodirectional?

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An important property of the vehicules seems to be missing: How can readers determine whether the trains are bidirectional or not? Bidirectional means: with two fully equipped driver cockpits (on both ends). This is very important for considerations about city space, network complexity, flexibility and redundancy (turning loops at the terminal stations or between, rail changer points etc).--Sun-kid (talk) 19:30, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Alstom Citadis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

 N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:02, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Alstom Citadis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:33, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Alstom_Citadis/Archive_1&oldid=1140445287"