Talk:Almatti Dam
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Almatti Dam article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyediting edit
I made some changes in the "Height" section to try to improve the grammar. I hope I didn't remove or change anything substantial. Hopefully some more copyeditors can come along and help work on it. HotshotCleaner (talk) 00:27, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
- Missing citations really need addressing in the introduction. Soulparadox 10:09, 25 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soulparadox (talk • contribs)
fountains at almatti dam edit
beautiful fountains have been opened recently, if someone has photos plz upload them. Murughendra (talk) 10:16, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
page structure edit
I changed to structure of the page around a bit, i moved the big pic in the middle of the page to the info box. then removed the section end format to make the page more fluid looking.Cerberusrex (talk) 21:38, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Almatti Dam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070210022256/http://www.karnatakapower.com/almatti.htm to http://www.karnatakapower.com/almatti.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:15, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
MU (or GWh)? edit
Quote from article: "The target annual electric output of the dam is 560 MU (or GWh)."
What kind of unit is "MU"? I suggest only SI units (GWh) should be mentioned. --2A01:E35:8A37:A080:225:22FF:FEBC:B7E3 (talk) 12:21, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
Confusion of Units between text and Infobox edit
Something is clearly wrong with the figures on height in this article and I cannot work out which are correct without an independent source. The text suggests the high court raised the height from 160m to 524m. This would make it one of the highest dams in the world! The Infobox suggests the height is 524 ft which converts to 160m. Therefore how much did the high court raise the height?
If anyone can help with an independent source I would be grateful. MWchat (talk) 17:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)