Talk:Alma Mater (New York sculpture)/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by GhostRiver in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 18:19, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Reply


I can take a look at this! — GhostRiver 18:19, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Infobox and lede edit

"which is located on the steps leading to the Low Memorial Library on the Morningside Heights campus of Columbia University in Manhattan, New York City." → "which is located on the steps of the Low Memorial Library on the campus of Columbia University, in the Morningside Heights neighborhood of Manhattan in New York City."

  • No comma needed in "September, 1903"
  • Comma after "since its installation"
  • The dimensions in the infobox need a citation

History edit

Commission and installation edit

  • Link the first mention of Low Memorial Library
  • The first sentence is a little hard to follow. Recommend breaking it into two sentences as follows: Plan for a statue in front of the Low Memorial Library began upon the building's completion in 1897. When designing a set of stairs that would lead up to the building, Charles Follen McKim included an empty granite pedestal in the middle of the staircase, on which a statue might sit.
  • Pipe "Columbia College" to Columbia College (New York) and add another source that he attended that specific undergraduate college within the larger university, as well as the year of his death (the source only says he graduated in 1860)
  • "1902 Commencement" → "1902 commencement ceremony"
  • "made it so that it was only unveiled on" → "postponed the unveiling until"
  • "for the new school year" → "for the 1902-03 school year"
  • The last paragraph requires a little expansion; there's some vague history present in the word "rediscovered" – what happened in the interim?

Later history edit

  • Shrink the first wikilink so that it's just on "protests at Columbia", excluding "many"
  • How did it "come to represent the failures of the university's administration"?
  • Link patina
  • Comma after "as well as in October 1984"

Reception edit

  • "incorrectly claiming" needs expanded upon – did French comment and say that it wasn't a replica?

Design edit

  • The part about the college superstition is probably trivial
  • "though over time the original gilding wore off" → "although the original gilding wore away with time."
  • The part about the copy at the University of Havana should be expanded upon in the body, not just relegated to the caption.

References edit

  • References [11] and [26] are misformatted; they site the archival website and not the original source. You should be using the "cite book" template for [26].
  • Inconsistent date formatting

General comments edit

  • Photos are relevant and are either Creative Commons licensed or in the public domain
  • No stability concerns present in the revision history
  • Earwig score is a little high, but it looks like "gpsmycity.com" is directly copying from Wikipedia, not the other way around

Alright, found some areas in need of citation and/or expansion. Putting on hold now; let me know if there are any questions. — GhostRiver 18:42, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

@GhostRiver Done! As for the concern about the "incorrectly claiming" bit, the source the quotation as taken from only describes the claim as "erroneous" and doesn't elaborate further, and I can't seem to find either the primary source or the German statue it referred to. Normsupon (talk) 16:04, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Looks great now, happy to pass! — GhostRiver 17:21, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.