Talk:Allyson Pollock
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Untitled] edit
Notability: Have you read WP's strict guidelines on this? I'm unsure her publications alone are sufficient. Maybe. Please check them. The "insightful" has to go, as POV, even though cited. It doesn't mean anything useful in the context, either. Tony (talk) 07:54, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- Tony: I hope the Notability question is now settled with the addition of remarks related to Pollock's evidence-giving to the British Parliament and Welsh Assembly rohita (talk) 16:21, 23 October 2008 (UTC) rohita
Hello Tony. Please can you clarify what you mean with regard to Notability. Also, why don't you think that 'insightful' means anything useful? rohita (talk) 07:59, 23 October 2008 (UTC) rohita
- Rohita: it's at WP:notability. I presume you're going to fill out the details of her findings. Tony (talk) 09:39, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Allyson Pollock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090509081118/http://www.health.ed.ac.uk/CIPHP/Documents/EvidencetoWelshFinanceCommittee_Dec2007_000.pdf to http://www.health.ed.ac.uk/CIPHP/Documents/EvidencetoWelshFinanceCommittee_Dec2007_000.pdf
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.health.ed.ac.uk/CIPHP/Documents/PFIScotlandsPlanforExpansion_hellowell_pollock_pmm_002.pdf - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090509081118/http://www.health.ed.ac.uk/CIPHP/Documents/EvidencetoWelshFinanceCommittee_Dec2007_000.pdf to http://www.health.ed.ac.uk/CIPHP/Documents/EvidencetoWelshFinanceCommittee_Dec2007_000.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:32, 2 July 2017 (UTC)