| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled edit
TAGS
I am not sure how context is to be improved for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Like any technical area there is more than enough room for infinite digression into the minutiae of what may be said to "clarify" it. I have wikified it a bit, so I removed the wikify tag. I added citations, so I removed the noref tag. --Michaelrayw2 18:28, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
I think it might be useful to position his work in terms of schools of thought in psychology to a greater extent to make it easier for someone to connect him to other things they might think they know. He is some kind of behaviorist, right? Also, the material under the headings does seem a little terse. DCDuring 04:06, 2 September 2007 (UTC)