Talk:Alleged electoral manipulation in Pakistan

Shameless WP:SOAPBOXING

User:Bolt Kjerag, your continued insertion of a self-proclaimed Proof of Electoral Fraud website of dubious origin as a reference despite repeated warnings and a protection request at 2024 Pakistani general election is threatening to ruin the credibility of this article. If you insist on POV-pushing this source, as seen with your obsession with highlighting this in the source code, I would have no choice but to file an ANI against you. Borgenland (talk) 17:41, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Alleged poisoning of Bushra Bibi

The alleged poisoning of Bushra Bibi on February 10 occurred two days after the elections on February 8. How is this incident connected to election fraud when Bibi wasn't even a candidate in the election? Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 03:16, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

A certain IP editor has done this, maybe to push an agenda under a sock, but I really want to assume the best. VirtualVagabond (talk) 04:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

I deleted it initially, but they reinstated it. My only recourse now is to initiate a discussion. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 04:36, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

I’ve removed it since im not breaking the 3RR, this article shouldn’t be an epicentre of bias. VirtualVagabond (talk) 04:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Article has a few problems

The 2024 section has a few issues, mainly that because a certain editor seems like they may pushing a certain agenda, and may be POSSIBLY using a sock. And that the order of events is in a random order, it is clear whoever did this did not really care about presentation, and just dumped information as it went. I’m not blaming anybody for this, as I recognise a multitude of editors have been working hard on this article, and because of them, this article is way better off than what could have transpired. Just want to throw my two cents watching this article. VirtualVagabond (talk) 04:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Describing this article as having "a few problems" would be an understatement. The entire piece requires thorough review and rewriting at some point. They seem to be trying to associate every event with election fraud. In my opinion, an event should only be deemed part of election fraud if there is detailed coverage demonstrating its direct impact on the election outcome. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 04:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Has the offending IP been properly reported yet? Borgenland (talk) 17:51, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Interestingly, it could be attributed to my aura or some other factor, but historically, I haven't had much luck when reporting individuals, so I tend to avoid investing my time in such endeavors. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 18:05, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Reported them finally to ANI for NPA edits and WP:IDNHT and openly admitting to being a sock of that abominable offender. Borgenland (talk) 17:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

PROD

@SheriffIsInTown where could I find a discussion for the deletion, I'd like to comment on it. Borgenland (talk) 17:25, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

PROD does not entail any discussion. If you plan to object and commit to thoroughly reviewing the entire article for accuracy, then I can transfer it to a discussion. Alternatively, if you wish to endorse it, we can leave it as-is. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 17:51, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

I suggest take it to WP:AFD. SPEEDY is so harsh. --Saqib (talk) 22:38, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 February 2024

• What I think should be changed: Please remove the prod tag and bring it to AfD. I object to the nomination per WP:DEPROD.
• Why it should be changed: It has been objected and for controversial article like this, it is best to discuss it first.
• References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button): WP:DEPROD

103.178.52.8 (talk) 05:48, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

References

 Already done PianoDan (talk) 19:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)