Talk:All in the Family (song)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified


Fair use rationale for Image:Korn-aitf.jpg

edit
 

Image:Korn-aitf.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Notability

edit

There is no need to bring it up with WP:RFAR, because this definitely fails WP:NSONG.

  • Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable.  
  • Notability aside separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article  
  • Music and structure  
  • There are no references, and contains WP:OR.
  • Concept  
  • The section is unreferenced, and probably cannot be referenced.
  • No relaible results on Google search [1]
  • Nothing in Google books [2]
  • Nothing in scholar [3]
  • Nothing in news archives [4]
  • Media response  
  • The only reference is dead.
  • Track listing  
  • Needs expansion

As you can see, it is not notable, and fails to be a verifiable/detailed article, as it received three crosses and one neutral. With this in mind I see no need to bring it up with Arbitration users as it definitely fails the WP:NSONG criteria. With this in mind, I find that it is unarguable so I will redirect this to Follow the Leader (Korn album). CrowzRSA 00:40, 3 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Then review your checklist again because it's got 8 references, most of these I found using goggle books and the news archives, covering everything from criticism of the song and its impact. This is one of the key KoRn songs, artistically speaking. If you dispute, take it to AfD. The rest are cleanup issues, and can be dealt with normally. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 06:56, 4 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
It is against WP:MOS to cite references this broadly. They need to be way more specific. Either way that is NOTABILITY ASIDE. THE SONG IS NOT NOTABLE. I will list it for deletion since you keep bringing it back. CrowzRSA 21:03, 6 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on All in the Family (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply