Talk:All Eyes
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Robertsky in topic Requested move 5 March 2024
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | On 5 March 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from All Eyes (film) to All Eyes. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 5 March 2024 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. – robertsky (talk) 23:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
– Only exact title match, fairly uncontroversial. 162 etc. (talk) 23:34, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support All Eyes (film) → All Eyes and oppose All Eyes → All Eyes (disambiguation), but would support All Eyes → deleted to make room for move. There is WP:NOPRIMARYTOPIC since the only other entries on the dab page are a WP:DABMENTION and a differently-spelled stub listed under "See also". Both can be handled via a hatnote. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:34, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support the film has more views (637) than All Eyez (129)[[1]] anyway. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:40, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support All Eyes (film) → All Eyes, leaning oppose on All Eyes → All Eyes (disambiguation) per Roman Spinner. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 22:13, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.