Talk:Aliens: Colonial Marines/GA1
Latest comment: 5 years ago by TheJoebro64 in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TheJoebro64 (talk · contribs) 23:05, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
I've always liked Alien (not the third one or those crappy Predator crossover movies, those don't count). This looks like a very interesting article. Expect comments by the end of the week. JOEBRO64 23:05, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- Lead
- I'd link to science fiction film in the first sentence.
- Done
- It was published by Sega and released for the Microsoft Windows...—I think you can cut "and released for" from this sentence, as being released is implied by "published".
- Done
- Could you be a bit specific as to what a "Colonial Marine" is? Wikipedia is geared to a general audience so this could possibly confuse readers who aren't familiar with the Alien mythos.
- Added fictional military unit
- ...released for the Microsoft Windows, PlayStation 3, and Xbox 360 platforms—Similarly, I would trim "the" and "platforms".
- Done
- Upon release, Colonial Marines...—"Upon release" is unnecessary because most, if not all reviews are published when the game is released.
- Removed
- Do you think linking "unanimously negative reviews" to List of video games notable for negative reception would help? Most games listed there (like this one) do this.
- its technical issues—"Issue" is a WP:EUPHEMISM.
- Replaced with technical problems
- Gameplay
- See my note about "Colonial Marines" above.
- Added fictional military unit
- Scenarios include Team Deathmatch, where both teams must kill as many opposing players as possible, Extermination, where Colonial Marines must detonate bombs in egg-infested areas protected by Aliens, Escape, which involves Colonial Marines completing objectives to reach a destination while being assaulted by Aliens, and Survivor, where Colonial Marines must survive attacks from Aliens with limited health and ammunition resources for as long as possible. The modes should be split by semicolons because each item in this is actually a complete sentence, so using commas would make the entire thing a run-on.
- Done
- Alien ranks unlock new abilities for Alien characters. Such as?
- Plot
- prior to its arrival at...—This is a WP:EASTEREGG.
- Removed
- Development
- considerable amount of pre-production—If my understanding is correct, hyphens should only be used in "pre-"/"re-" words if it creates ambiguous meaning.
- Removed hyphens
- view Gearbox and Timegate disagreed with. All other instances of TimeGate capitalize the G.
- Fixed
- How much of the game was actually made by Gearbox is highly questioned. Questioned by whom?
- However, without considering Gearbox's pre-production time—See my previous comment on the hyphen in "preproduction".
- Fixed
- Marketing and release
- The game was officially announced—If my understanding is correct, general consensus is that official is an unnecessary qualifier. In most contexts no one will assume these things were unofficial if you don't specify.
- Colonial Marines would be released in Spring 2012 ... fall 2012...—WP:SEASON.
- Fixed
- Is there a reason the Wii U version was canceled? The source seems to indicate that it was canceled in favor of Shoot Many Robots and an unspecified project, but I just wanted to double-check.
- Downloadable content
- but it is unclear who assisted Gearbox with the development of Stasis Interrupted. Could this be worded a bit better? From my experience "it was", "it is", etc.-like statements are considered unclear.
- Reception
- See my comment above about linking to the list of video games notable for negative reception.
- Replied above
- Electronic Gaming Monthly, the only notable publication which gave the game a very positive review—This strikes me as a bit WP:ORy and WP:NPOV. Furthermore, it is probably incorrect: The Guardian, which is certainly notable, gave the game 4/5 stars.
- Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Titles#Major works: "Online magazines, newspapers, and news sites with original content should generally be italicized".
- Done
- References
- All good.
- Miscellaneous
- Just as a general note for the entire article: I noticed instances of both American and British variants of English being used (i.e. "per cent" and "cancelled" but also "criticize" and "license"). I know this probably wasn't intentional, but I'd pick one or the other.
Expect a completed review by Monday. JOEBRO64 22:37, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Niwi3, that's it. A few blips here and there, but overall this is a well-written and thoroughly interesting read. Nice work. JOEBRO64 00:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- @TheJoebro64: Thank you for your review, really appreciated! I'm currently at work now, so I'll address the above issues once I'll get home. Regards --Niwi3 (talk) 08:53, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- I have addressed all the issues and left some comments above (some of the issues were fixed by Popcornduff, who copy-edited the article). Let me know what you think. Thanks --Niwi3 (talk) 20:44, 22 May 2018 (UTC)