Talk:Ali Aldabbagh

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Awad12345

The refrence is not fair as nothing mentioned that there was a relation between Aldabbagh and the Russian arms deal which was cancelled< Aldabbagh was not even a member of the delegate which went to Moscow. Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page)..https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/politics/2012/11/malikis-spokesman-quits-after-russian-arms-deal-scandal.html#ixzz6iThuJLZS also it was a political machination. Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/politics/2012/11/malikis-spokesman-quits-after-russian-arms-deal-scandal.html#ixzz6iThIqneI I would suggest the following amendment please: He served as government spokesman until 29 November 2012 when his resignation was accepted by Maliki. Aldabbagh resigned from his post due to false alleged and political machination against him in the cancelledhttps://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/politics/2012/11/iraqi-mps-demand-investigation-into-cancelled-arms-deal.html Russian arms deal.Awad12345 (talk) 10:26, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the meesage here instead of doing unconstructive edits. If you read the article carefully, the related statement is already like what you have written above. There is no statement claiming that he was involved in the scandal. Have a nice day, --Egeymi (talk) 13:01, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you my friend Egeymi, the other issue in the party it is mentioned that Aldabbagh is part of Baath party while in Arabic it is mention as he is in Daawa party which contrast each other, actually both of then is wrong , he is independent and heading an intellectual group as mentioned, so kindly if you amend that party. Thanks --Awad12345 (talk) 19:58, 4 January 2021 (UTC) Dear Egeymi: Thank you for your clarification, Actually the other issue is the party in which is quoted as Aldabbagh is from Baath party while in the Arabic page written as he is from Daawa party which is a contradiction, both of them incorrect, the correct one he is independent, one more thing there is a paragraph said he run a family business company called Tiger, the source is not true it is wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awad12345 (talkcontribs) 11:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply