Talk:Algospeak
Latest comment: 1 day ago by AltoStev in topic (invisible comment referral) not a duplicate sentence
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Feedback from New Page Review process
editI left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: There's a case for a merge to Leet#Algospeak, given that this page is short, but perhaps there is space to expand the topic here. The topic is worth covering somewhere!
Klbrain (talk) 07:34, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with Quintopia who said "... its lexicon is so distinct from leet, and the demographic creating it is so disconnected from the demographic that created leet. Given how alive and dynamic algospeak is, it no longer makes sense to have the two share a page". But yeah, this page is rather short. I think the topic will inspire a more expansive article in time Wesadius (talk) 11:50, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- I concur. Kronenn (talk) 01:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- I agree as creator. I have listed sources in the lead paragraph that could be incorporated. I might get into expanding this article once I have enough time on my hands, but help from outside is always welcome. Ca talk to me! 10:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
(invisible comment referral) not a duplicate sentence
editIt might read similar, but it is not a duplicate, since there is no connective sentence that actually states "algospeak can be used to avoid such and such". This connective sentence is not original research as it is obviously supported by the citation, but it's easy to miss that obvious things might need to be said. AltoStev (talk) 23:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)