Deletion edit

Candidate for deletion; CSD A7 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.7.237.21 (talk) 17:19, 22 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • The article contains at least three assertions of importance - captain of winning team; bested Jeremy Paxman; internet sensation. Colonel Warden (talk) 21:34, 22 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion declined edit

I've found enough in the way of citations from reliable sources to provide me with prima facie evidence of notability -- this is a "sufficient assertion" as far as I'm concerned. Whether this would survive an articles for deletion (AfD) process I cannot say; it might be challenged on the basis of the "one event" concept. However, I note that the AfD process was initiated by an IP editor, User:86.7.237.21, who cannot complete it for technical reasons; I have also deleted that initial start to a process that cannot be completed. I'll leave that editor a note asking if s/he wants help. Accounting4Taste:talk 20:12, 22 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sensitive...? edit

Is it really necessary for the internet at large to know whether or not he's circumcised? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.28.249.146 (talk) 23:40, 4 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Afd: Nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander_Guttenplan_(2nd_nomination) edit

Nominated for deletion per notability guidelines (one event) Benboy00 (talk) 02:36, 11 August 2013 (UTC)Reply