Talk:Alentejo - NUTSII

Not only NUTS II

"Alentejo" is the name chosen for a NUTS II region, but it is also a traditional name for a different region and this traditional name is the only one used in everyday talk by Portuguese people. It is a "legalist" mistake to address only the NUTS II region in this article. Velho 13:58, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

I agree entirely. To most people, "Alentejo" means the former provinces of Alto Alentejo and Baixo Alentejo, which correspond roughly to the current subregions of Alto Alentejo, Alentejo Central, Baixo Alentejo and Alentejo Litoral. The inclusion of Lezíria do Tejo, which is in the former province of Ribatejo, is nothing but a political maneuver. Incidentally, the former division in provinces is arguably the one that people in Portugal most identify with, not the statistical regions or the districts, especially when the latter cut across provincial boundaries (e.g. Leiria, Setúbal). --Jcmo (talk) 10:40, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

I agree, that's obvious. Made the change. --Xyzt1234 (talk) 19:04, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Request for link to website

The Alentejo page includes a paragraph copied from my web page www.azenhadoramalho.com/alentejo-portugal.htm

I would like a link to my web page as a reference.

The paragraph is

The population is low and declining - especially to the east of Alentejo. Portuguese migrate from the villages to the towns and from the towns to cities beyond Alentejo. Virtually the only migration into Alentejo is from Northern Europeans looking to escape their overcrowded countries, either permanently or for sunny holiday retreats.

The title of my page is: Alentejo, Portugal, the essence, characteristics and places.

Many thanks.

Ramazen (talk) 15:03, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Campilhas March 2015-1a.jpg to appear as POTD

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Campilhas March 2015-1a.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on June 10, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-06-10. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:38, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Picture of the day

A typical landscape of the rural Alentejo region of Portugal, with an undulating wheat field and a solitary cork oak.Photograph: Joaquim Alves Gaspar

Subregions of Portugal (Ribatejo, Alentejo and others)

In 1998, there was a referendum on regionalization in Portugal (about the creation of new administrative regions) which was rejected in 1998. Neither were any EU statistical regions approved, nor they were recognized by the people who had the word according to the 1998 referendum. Therefore, the NUTS regions (apart from Azores and Madeira which are autonomous regions and apart from Algarve, which matches the Faro District) should not be considered as Portuguese subregions, since they were only created and redrawn for statistical purposes.

I'd suggest that some sort of compromise could be made concerning to some particular regions, specially concerning to Ribatejo, since the NUTS II classification was made only for statistical purposes (and were redrawn, for those purposes, namely not to let some parts of the former NUTS II region of Lisboa e Vale do Tejo (Ribatejo and the North side of Estremadura) to be affected in relation to the allocation EU funds.

Besides that everyone in Portugal calls the territory roughly corresponding to the {Santarém District) as Ribatejo, not Alentejo (apart from Ponte de Sôr, which is in another district and sometimes is considered to be in Ribatejo though most of the times is considered to be in Alentejo. There are plenty of sites that show that Alentejo doesn't include Ribatejo, like the following ones: [1], [2], [3] (published by the Portuguese Government itself), [4], etc. (note: I only indicated maps published after the redrawing of the NUTS II region in 2011).

The other regions are also commonly called by their traditional names, but in a broader sense there are indeed the North, Center, Alentejo (this one not with the borders defined by NUTS II) and Algarve regions, along with the Metropolitan area of Lisbon, which corresponds to the NUTS II region of Lisbon. I don't disagree, at all, that the NUTS II and NUTS III are included in the location of the places, though I'd prefer that the proper context would be provided and the traditional regions would be added to the description (preferably those established in 1936), with an explanation that those regions are not administrative (since their administrative functions were later transfered to the districts), but they're historical and cultural regions, with their designations being broadly used in Portugal (unlike many of the NUTS regions). Thanks a lot the attention of the users who may wish to participate in this discussion. Greetings!

P.S.: Portuguese editors (and particularly from Ribatejo and Alentejo are very welcome to this discussion, since it's an issue that concerns to Portugal, to Ribatejo and Alentejo.Viet-hoian1 (talk) 02:19, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alentejo - NUTSII. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140222064122/http://www.portugalglobal.pt/PT/InvestirPortugal/PorquePortugal/Paginas/RegioesMultifacetadas.aspx to http://www.portugalglobal.pt/PT/InvestirPortugal/PorquePortugal/Paginas/RegioesMultifacetadas.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:53, 30 June 2017 (UTC)