Talk:Aldo Capitini

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Cut and paste edit

User:Raffaeleb has cut and pasted a biography of Capitini from an unidentified source. I have deleted it as copyright violation. If included, it should be paraphrased and the source given. Marshall46 (talk) 21:13, 8 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Seems to be https://www.reteccp.org/biblioteca/disponibili/ccp/barbiero/barbiero5.html Ian Spackman (talk) 16:04, 9 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Talk: Aldo Capitini][User:Raffaeleb]: Raffaeleb is my nick name, my full name is Raffaele Barbiero and I am the author of the modification on the English version about the article on Capitini on 9th Novemeber 2011. It is my essay that I did for a Master. So I did not plagiarise anyone or worste copying anyone. It is my essay and I sent to the website of reteccp because my association is part of this bigger Italian association.
I did not konw that I have to authorize wikipedia to put an article that is mine, anyway I declare that I agree to publish my essay on wikipedia. All my article is full of references and any souces is cited, so I think I can edit the English version of Aldo Capitini.
Let me know if now I can or if I miss something or I did something wrong again. Thank you for your attention and patience. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.27.242.89 (talk) 01:11, 10 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Raffaele. Thank you for your contribution. I did not realise that the text you added was your own work. Wikipedia needs that addition to this article, but the statements have to be taken from a reliable source. If you could add the foototes showing where you got the information from, that would be good. Marshall46 (talk) 16:13, 10 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Would you like to have my essay in wikipedia or not? edit

User: Raffaeleb I am Raffaele Barbiero, nickname Raffaeleb. It is the third time that I tried to post my paper to Aldo Capitini in English version. The contribute is my essay I did in a Master and I agree to put on wikipedia web site. It was published for the first time in a Italian web site: www.reteccp.it, as I wrote in a reference footnote. I think I follow all your rules to put my contribution, but it was removed everytime. Why it have been removed again? If I did something wrong, please help me to solve the problem, otherwise tell me if you wish my contribution or not. This time, it will be my last time I spend to do it. I am a little tired. Finally, I did reference for all my contribution, so really I do not understand what you want.87.16.241.30 (talk) 14:25, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Raffaeleb (talk) 15:15, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Raffaele. Yes, your contribution is valued. The way to ensure that it is kept this time is to add the references inside your text, not at the end. You add a reference like this < ref>details of reference</ref > (but without the spaces) I am putting a message on the user pages of all those who have removed your text telling them that you have added it in good fairh. Marshall46 (talk) 14:26, 28 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Article in Italian Wikipedia edit

There is more information there that could be added here.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aldo Capitini. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:19, 30 June 2017 (UTC)Reply