Talk:Albania in the Eurovision Song Contest 2013/GA1

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 17:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)Reply


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

I will start my review of this tonight or tomorrow; however, you need to fix the nomination template for the other song contest participation of Albania since it is currently displaying the review as unknown on the music GANs page. --K. Peake 17:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • Infobox looks good!
  • Target Radio Televizioni Shqiptar to RTSH
  • "and a live performance in the Netherlands." → "and a live performance, the latter of which was in the Netherlands."
  • "to qualify to for the final" → "to qualify for the final" with the target
  • Iaof2017 "to qualify to for the final" is still the wording – fix this. --K. Peake 15:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Kyle Peake Done--Lorik17 (talk) 16:03, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Either add one or more sentences to the second para or make the lead only one para, as the last para is much too short right now

Background edit

  • "finishing in the seventh place," → "and finished in the seventh place,"

Before Eurovision edit

Festivali i Këngës edit

  • Shouldn't the img be aligned to the left since the succeeding one is on the right?
Kyle Peake I think its appropriate as it is because there is enough space between both images but if you don't agree with it I can change it.--Lorik17 (talk) 15:14, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Images usually have different alignments for multiple appearances, but this is not a GA requirement so it can remain. --K. Peake 15:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Target Radio Televizioni Shqiptar to RTSH
  • "on 22 December 2012 held at the" → "on 22 December 2012, being held at the" to specify the entire competition was held at the venue
  • "to participate in the competition," → "to participate in Festivali i Këngës,"
  • "being shortlisted to" → "with them being shortlisted to"
  • "On 30 November," → "On 30 November 2012,"
Competing entries edit
  • Table is missing the appropriate source(s)
Shows edit
Semi-finals edit
  • "In it, the shows featured guest performances by" → "During the semi-finals, guest performances were featured from"
Final edit
  • "emerged as the winner and were simultaneously announced as the country's" → "emerged as the winning artists and were simultaneously announced as Albania's"

Promotion edit

  • "premiered via the Eurovision Song Contest's official YouTube channel of the Eurovision Song Contest on" → "premiered via the official YouTube channel of the Eurovision Song Contest on"

At Eurovision edit

  • It is not mentioned anywhere by the source that the draw was held at the Malmö City Hall, even though the remainder of the sentence is backed up
  • "for the 2013 contest" → "for the contest"
  • "among the top 10 entries in the second semi-final" → "among the top 10 entries" since we already know it is an entry in the second semi-final
  • Target final to Eurovision Song Contest 2013#Final
  • "in the contest." → "in the Eurovision Song Contest."
  • The last sentence is completely unsourced

Voting edit

  • All of the points at which you write "the first semi-final" are inaccurate; the country competed in the second semi-final
  • "by the country on" → "by the country for"
  • "the country finished in" → "Albania finished in"
  • "In the final, Albania awarded its 12 points to Macedonia in the semi-final," → "Albania awarded its 12 points to Macedonia in the second semi-final,"
Points awarded to Albania edit
  • Good
Points awarded by Albania edit

Notes edit

  • Good

References edit

External links edit

  • Good

Final comments and verdict edit

  •   On hold until all of the issues are fixed, but I particularly noticed you have improved in terms of ref layout; good luck with the article though! --K. Peake 09:19, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Kyle Peake Thanks for the review, I followed your comments. :)--Lorik17 (talk) 14:41, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Iaof2017  Pass now after you fixed that one last query! --K. Peake 16:16, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply