Talk:Alban Lafont

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Jaguar in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Alban Lafont/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 11:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply


I should have this done by Sunday JAGUAR  11:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    The lead needs to be expanded to summarise all of the article. At the moment it doesn't comply per WP:LEAD
    "He spent six years with Lattoise before signing with Ligue 1 side Toulouse in 2014." - this needs a citation
    "when a group of armed gunmen opened fire in a Cappuccino restaurant" - I don't think this needs italicising
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    No original research found.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

I'll leave this on hold until the lead can be expanded to summarise the article. Otherwise everything is OK. JAGUAR  18:20, 3 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi Jaguar, thank you for the review! I have expanded the lede as requested. Let me know if there are any other issues that pop up. Cheers, Liam E. Bekker (talk) 22:28, 3 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for addressing all of the issues! Most importantly the lead has been expanded to a suitable length so I think this should be good to go now.   JAGUAR  10:05, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply