Talk:Albacore (dinghy)

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Mr swordfish in topic Photos

Fair use rationale for Image:AlbacoreLogo.gif

edit
 

Image:AlbacoreLogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:04, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Which variety of English for this article?

edit

An anonymous ip editor came by and changed the variety of English used on this page. I reverted it in accordance with:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#National_varieties_of_English

I think an argument can be made to have this article use British English rather than the US variant. Anyone care to make it? Mr. Swordfish (talk) 18:23, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

British origin and boat designer, British spelling often used in Canada as well so two of main Albacore countries use British type spelling. Dabbler (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
You have based your reasoning on the following sentence from the manual of style: "An article on a topic that has strong ties to a particular English-speaking nation should use the English of that nation." I think that is a sound reason to use the British variety in this article.
The manual of style also says "When an English variety's consistent usage has been established in an article, it is maintained in the absence of consensus to the contrary." Currently, the article uses the US variety, and has since 2004. So, to change it, we need to arrive at consensus here at the talk page. I am in favor (favour?) of making this change. Other opinions? Mr. Swordfish (talk) 15:34, 16 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Albacore (dinghy). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:45, 7 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Photos

edit

Although the Albacore is still in production with active racing fleets in the UK, US, and Canada, all the photos in the article are of boats that are forty years old or older.

I propose that we swap out some of the photos for more recent examples. I'm currently looking at several candidates, but need to get copyright clearance before including them in the article. BTW, the current "main" picture shows a boat from the 1960s that is not class legal for racing. Mr. Swordfish (talk) 21:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply