This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
Alan McGilvray is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I don't know if this has ever been reported anywhere, but I understand he was the driver in a car accident in Sydney in which a pedestrian was accidentally killed. I think this occurred sometime between the 1940s and the 1950s. The reason I know of this, is that the pedestrian was my uncle's brother. I'm certainly not wanting to blacken McGilvray's name (it was an accident), and I'd need to find a published source, but I'd appreciate another opinion as to whether this is an appropriate matter to include in his article. If it is factual, I can't see why not. Others may disagree. JackofOz22:15, 6 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
I'd say that its not worthy of a mention (with due respect to your uncle's brother), even if a source was found. If it was widely known and reported (which it doesn't seem to be), then maybe, but bad things do happen and they're not always encyclopaedic. That's my opinion anyway. —Moondyne01:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply