Talk:Alan Bates (subpostmaster)

Latest comment: 2 days ago by Southdevonian in topic A couple of dates

Birth date

edit

FreeBMD shows only one Alan Bates birth registered in Liverpool in 1954 and 1955. It's this one: Alan W. Bates, mother's name Antoney, registered in Liverpool North, in the third quarter of 1954. That would give a current age of 69. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:41, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

See WP:BLPPRIMARY. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:44, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
As ever, I wasn't proposing use of FreeBMD as a source in the article. But, in the absence of any information to contradict this, that would seem to be the record of his birth. We can't pretend that record doesn't exist. It's very unlikely to be a mistake. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Spelling

edit

Bates set up the Justice for Subpostmasters Alliance. Not the "Justice for Sub-postmasters Alliance". This article should use the correct spelling, "subpostmaster" throughout, including in its title, as does British Post Office scandal.

Talk:British Post Office scandal#Sub-postmasters [SIC] also refers. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yes, that's right. I somehow doubt Bates is as interested in correct use or non-use of the hyphen as some editors here are. But it's certainly used consistently without a hyphen at the website It's a loss less fiddly without one. There seems to be a bit of a contradiction between his use of the word and it's standard use in dictionaries? Perhaps WP:MoS is the venue to resolve that? Martinevans123 (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC) p.s. is jfsa.org.uk/ WP:BLPPRIMARY?Reply
p.p.s. I see that National Federation of SubPostmasters uses a big P.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinevans123 (talkcontribs) 13:20, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Feedback from New Page Review process

edit

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Alan Bates is someone of exceptional notability given his central role, over decades, in uncovering what is, arguably, the biggest Miscarriage of justice in British legal history. THis article needs to be expanded.

MarkDask 10:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

The legal case should be explicitly described. He's mentioned a few times here. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
He gave evidence (briefly) to the Inquiry on 16/01/24. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Change title?

edit

In my opinion Alan Bates is better known as a campaigner rather than a sub-postmaster. I think we should change the title to Alan Bates (campaigner) STCSTW (talk) 08:09, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

That is certainly a more accurate reflection of why he is notable. Martinevans123 (talk) 08:13, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Whilst I agree with this "Evans" chap (who he?) about the reflection of his notability, I feel that we should not change the title. Why not? Ease of access, fast recognition. "Alan Bates" is not exactly an unlikely English name so if we go to "AB (campaigner)" you're always going to have a moment of wait, what, which campaigner? Is there perhaps an Alan Bates who campaigns for nature, fair taxation, better intonation on C trumpets, bring back the Marathon bar? Dunno. But if you leave it on "AB (subpostmaster)" you get absolutely instant recognition that you have the right guy. It nails it, for all the right reasons, in the very nanosecond that you read it. Please don't move it – it would be an unfortunate error. Best to all, DBaK (talk) 20:15, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

A couple of dates

edit

I removed 23 years from the intro, because I don't think he has actually been campaigning on behalf of subpostmasters since 2001, which was when he experienced his first Horizon shortfall. When do you date the campaigning from? When he set up a website? When he contacted media? I don't think it really matters exactly how many years count as campaigning and, since the intro gives a timeline of events, it isn't necessary to specify the number of years. Regarding date of birth - I seem to remember from another discussion that his birth was registered in 1954 but freebmd doesn't count as a reliable source. Any better [1]? I am not keen on using court transcripts or witness statements, but others might disagree. Southdevonian (talk) 18:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC)Reply