Talk:Al-Zamakhshari

Did he say anywhere that he was Iranian? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.215.124.25 (talk) 06:51, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 January 2021 and 18 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Pacific854.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Untitled

I don't get it, is this guy a hanafi or mutazil?

“ . As for az-Zamakhshari, let alone being a Hanafi, he did not even belong to Ahl as-Sunnat. He belonged to the Mutazila, one of the seventy-two heretical groups. Because the 'ibadat of the Mutazila resembled those of the Hanafi madhhab, the ignorant think that they were Hanafis.[1] ”

“ One of the noteworthy scholars of Hanafi Madh’hab, Zamakhshari rahimahullaah. said, “If there is a mother of misguidance then it is blind bigoted ”

[2]

“ We read in Tafseer Baydhawi Volume2 p. 9

Mut'ah is Nikah for a fixed time

Zamakshari was a renowned Sunni scholar and Imam Radhi praised him in his "Madhab Shafeeya," saying that 'he was a high ranking scholar, adherent of the Hanafi Madhab' Zamakshari deemed Mut'ah women to be wives, and Qurtubi and Baydhawi both confirmed that Mut'ah was a form of Nikah. [3]

”

What is this about? --Striver 01:20, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

He was a Hanafi Mutazili, in that age a number of the Mutazili Mutakalimun were Ahl al-Ra'i or Hanafi in fiqh -- [Kemal S. 11:51. 27 February 2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.83.18.213 (talk) 16:52, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

That is confusing! I think we should remove mention of his Madhab and just put Muslim. --alidoostzadeh (talk) 19:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

His religious affiliation has already been added with proper references. So, that part seems to be complete. Xareen (talk) 17:09, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Al-Zamakhshari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060831205450/http://www.orient.pu.ru/old/Library/mscr2005/compilev.html to http://www.orient.pu.ru/old/Library/mscr2005/compilev.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061019100535/http://www.orient.pu.ru/old/Library/mscr2005/176.jpg to http://www.orient.pu.ru/old/Library/mscr2005/176.jpg
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041217052202/http://14.1911encyclopedia.org/Z/ZA/ZAMAKHSHARI.htm to http://14.1911encyclopedia.org/Z/ZA/ZAMAKHSHARI.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060913104826/http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Zamakhshari to http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Zamakhshari

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:48, 24 December 2017 (UTC)