Talk:Akihiko Saito

Untitled

I knew Saito when he served in the Legion. Other than this basic fact and that he died of wounds incurred while serving in a security job in Iraq, I do not think that he has any particular claim to fame, nor that he deserves an article here in Wikipedia. 91.177.26.168 (talk) 14:12, 18 December 2007 (UTC) Chris

Disagree with non-notability; although he was neither the first kidnapped or killed, Japanese officials including Japan’s defense chief, Yoshinori Ono, were questioned in various international forums on verification of his identity, questions of his captivity, and what the Japanese government was doing/would do, including the possible complete withdrawal of 550-600 Japanese military personnel in Iraq; the military personnel were not withdrawn until just over a year later in July 2006, and non-military not completely until December 2008; this may not have been acknowledged as part of the official decision. Possibility of merging would likely be to Japanese Iraq Reconstruction and Support Group, where the date of captivity/death seems incorrect, with dead link reference. Dru of Id (talk) 16:15, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

AS I remember, Aki died May 9, 2005 while guarding a convoy of trucks delivering medical supplies to the Iraqi Ministry of Health. I am 99% sure I saw video of his dead body (on the internet) within a day or two of his death and thought we had provided information to Coalition Forces to refute claims that he was being held hostage. I had lunch with him (at the Abu Ghraib Warehouse Distribution Center near Baghdad International Airport where we both worked) the day before he died and recall seeing him at breakfast and as he left with the convoy that day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.142.219.141 (talk) 20:23, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Akihiko Saito. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050527083527/http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticle.asp?xfile=data%2Fnewsmakers%2F2005%2FMay%2Fnewsmakers_May4.xml&section=newsmakers to http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticle.asp?xfile=data%2Fnewsmakers%2F2005%2FMay%2Fnewsmakers_May4.xml&section=newsmakers
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029195647/http://www.modoracle.com/news_articles/mod_news/Japan_Wont_Pull_Troops_Over_Kidnapping_8242.htm to http://www.modoracle.com/news_articles/mod_news/Japan_Wont_Pull_Troops_Over_Kidnapping_8242.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:54, 2 January 2018 (UTC)