Talk:Airport Central railway station

Latest comment: 1 year ago by LunaEatsTuna in topic GA Review
Featured articleAirport Central railway station is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 9, 2023.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 22, 2023Good article nomineeListed
March 22, 2023Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 9, 2022.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Perth's Airport Central railway station, which opens today, has the longest operating escalators in the southern hemisphere?
Current status: Featured article

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by CSJJ104 (talk) 19:35, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Created by Steelkamp (talk). Self-nominated at 12:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC).Reply

  • Should that be "longest single-span uninterrupted escalator"? Betterkeks (talk) 14:11, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
    • I've added an alt hook seeing as three out of the four sources say that, and I'll leave it to the reviewer to decide which is best. In my opinion, when people hear "longest escalator", they automatically assume "longest single-span uninterrupted escalator". Steelkamp (talk) 03:21, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
  •   Article expansion began on the 1st of September. Expansion was sufficiently big, hook is interesting and cited in source, earwig only highlighted direct quotes, QPQ done. I'd be fine with the original hook - 2 interrupted escalators don't count in most people's book, I'd say. I would mention Perth in there somewhere, though, "Airport Central" can be anywhere in the Southern Hemisphere from Cape Town to Christchurch. Juxlos (talk) 11:08, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
    • Thanks for the review Juxlos. I've added mention of Perth to the hooks. Steelkamp (talk) 06:21, 10 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
      • @Steelkamp and Juxlos: - Unsure if I'm being needlessly pedantic here, but the source used in the article for this being the longest elevator, the Airport Central fact sheet, only says it is one of the longest, not the longest. It's easily corrected, perhaps with one of the sources listed here, but I wasn't sure if there was a reason they are not already cited in the article. CSJJ104 (talk) 20:25, 1 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
        • Interesting. That source's archive from November 2021 says it is the longest. The source appears to have been updated in September 2022 to say it is one of the longest. This might be in reference to an escalator that was installed at Sydney Central railway station earlier this year, which is 45 metres (148 ft) long. That escalator opens in 2024 though. The Airport Central station escalator was the longest in the southern hemisphere when it was installed and will be the longest operating escalator in the southern hemisphere on 9 October. As such, I have added an ALT 2 blurb. Steelkamp (talk) 13:59, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
          • ALT2 is fine, although possibly with "single-span" removed? My concern though is that WP:DYK rule 3 requires the fact to be cited at the end of the sentence in the article, so we would need another citation here either as well as or replacing the one we have that explicitly states it is the longest operating escalator. CSJJ104 (talk) 14:56, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
            • I've changed the article, how is that? ...although possibly with "single-span" removed? Yes, of course. Steelkamp (talk) 12:17, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
              • Looks good. I can promote it now. CSJJ104 (talk) 19:34, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Airport Central railway station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 03:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • This is a great article; nice work! I have placed it one hold for now and left some comments below. Please ping me once you have addressed my concerns so that I can know when to reevaluate. Thanks! 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 03:54, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio check edit

Earwig says good to go. No concerns from me either. Quotations used in-line with WP:COPYQUOTE.

Files edit

All images are relevant, high quality and copyright-free:

  • File:Airport Central Station exterior, Western Australia, 11 October 2022 01.jpg: CC-BY-SA 4.0, taken by nominator;
  • File:Airport Central Station Skybridge exterior, Western Australia, 11 October 2022 07.jpg: ibid;
  • File:Airport Central Station Skybridge interior, Western Australia, 11 October 2022 03.jpg: ibid;
  • File:Airport Central Station, Western Australia, 11 October 2022 16.jpg: ibid;
  • File:Airport Central Station, Western Australia, 11 October 2022 28.jpg: ibid;
  • File:Airport Central Station Skybridge interior, Western Australia, 11 October 2022 11.jpg: ibid;
  • File:Airport Central railway station under construction, May 2020 04.jpg: CC-BY-SA 4.0, uploaded to Commons by registered user;
  • File:Airport Central Station, Western Australia, 11 October 2022 44.jpg: CC-BY-SA 4.0, taken by nominator.

Cheers for all the images!

Prose edit

  • "On the concourse are fare gates, toilets, and a staff office." – I may be being picky here, but this seems like an excessive amount of detail. I would assume all airport stations have these. Alternatively, perhaps it could be rephrased as "On the concourse are the fare gates and utilities." or something similar.
    • Done.
  • "There are also two emergency staircases at either end of the platform, and two emergency staircases from the concourse, which all lead to external ground level." – same concerns as above. The public links to the three levels seem notable to me, but mentioning all the emergency exists is fairly intricate detailing.
    • I've removed that entire sentence.
  • "and an original musical score." – do the sources say by whom?
    • Unfortunately I could not find any information on this.
      • That is indeed unfortunate.
  • "There is also artwork along the walls and travellators designed by Jade Dolman and Crispian Warrell of Nani Creative." – located throughout the station? Also:
    • Clarified.
  • Wikilink travellators
    • Done.
  • "The station's design was released on 28 May 2017." – elaborate; where/how was this released?
    • It was released online and at a press conference I think. I don't think this is detail that is necessary.
      • Fair enough; I agree.
  • "70% complete" – change to "70 percent complete" per WP:%.
    • Done.
  • "a division of the PTA." – I would unabbreviate PTA.
    • Done.
  • "The station is predicted to have average daily boardings of 6,100," – any updates since opening?
    • No. There is no routine release of station patronage data so the only hope is that if patronage is particularly good, the government will release it to show off.
      • I see!

Refs edit

All sources used are RS. Passes spotcheck—no concerns with refs 2, 7, 15, 16, 20, 31, 37, 40, 50 or 53. Nice work!

Other edit

Infobox, short description, WP:ALT text, navs, cats and other templates good.

  • The amount of YouTube URLs in External links is quite excessive. At most I think only URLs 1, 3 and 4 could be kept if any.
    • I've removed all the Youtube URLS except for the station animation.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.