Talk:Aircrew survival equipmentman

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Notable PRs edit

Please do not add your name to the list of Notable PRs simply because you are a LPO or chief. The persons listed should have accomplishments that reach far beyond their billet description. Obviously, life saving is a notable profession in itself, which is why I worked very hard to improve this article from one paragraph to what you see today. The section is there for those who have set themselves apart from the rest of the PR community by acts of heroism, patriotism, community service, or have become a public figure. - PR

Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Capital letters edit

US Navy titles and job ratings that have compound words are always capitalized in official documents. For Wiki articles the Wikipedia Manual of Style/Titles of people also confirms this. The inclusion of (PR) is due to the the full rating name being changed from Parachute Rigger to Aircrew Survival Equipmentman (PR), but still being used as an official rating abbreviation of the United States Navy. (Example: The abbreviated title of an Aircrew Survival Equipmentman 1st Class Petty Officer would be PR1.)

Excerpt from Wikipedia Manual of Style

When an unhyphenated compound title such as vice president or chief executive officer is capitalized (unless this is simply because it begins a sentence), each word begins with a capital letter. 04:29, 1 September 2013‎ User:Topbookclub

Official documents have no bearing here. The manual of style lays down how Wikipedia's house style capitalises words, and it makes quite clear the job titles and ranks are only capitalised when used as part of a name (eg "the general ordered the attack" but "General Smith ordered the attack"). The abbreviation has no place in the name - see WP:NATURAL for an explanation of why Aircrew survival equipmentman is a sufficiently full article name. Further, please note that your proposed article name did not survive first contact with the technical move request for both these good reasons. Shem (talk) 21:17, 4 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Claiming that official documents have no bearing on Wikipedia articles is like saying that references must be avoided at all costs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.192.72.91 (talk) 11:42, 19 June 2015 (UTC) Reply

Unrelated topics edit

The Leap Frogs aren't aircrew survival equipmentmen, and the parachutist insignia aren't for maintain equipment, but for performing parachute jumps. I'm not even sure that the Navy & Marine Corps Parachutist badge is used by aircrew survival equipmentmen any more. I propose that the unrelated topics are removed. Sjö (talk) 10:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aircrew survival equipmentman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply