Talk:Airbus Helicopters H160

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was Merge. Nothing significant to merge, so simply redirect. BilCat (talk) 22:20, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

---

I propose a merge from H160M Guepard:- variant--Petebutt (talk) 05:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

• Hello, would you suggest that the Eurocopter EC725 page become a variant of the Eurocopter EC225 Super Puma page? The second being the military version of the first like the Airbus Helicopters H160M Guépard is compared to the Airbus Helicopters H160? Sorry if I seem curious to you.--Arnaud Lambert (talk) 09:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

The point is that , as it stands this is not as good as a proper section in the H160 article would be. If the author, or anybody else, develops it into a proper full-blown article, then the argument would probably be moot!--Petebutt (talk) 10:20, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

• I do not see anything admissible in your dispute of my article. But hey it is undoubtedly a pleasure for you to challenge its validity, it allows you to exist in relation to the community. It's pathetic stupid filth.--Arnaud Lambert (talk) 11:38, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

We don't tolerate trolls and vandals on Wikipedia!!--Petebutt (talk) 14:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

@Arnaud Lambert: It’s not OK to address other editors this way. Please focus on the content of the articles. --Ariadacapo (talk) 16:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

• I support the merge, Airbus Helicopters H160M Guépard today does not contain information that is significantly different from this article. Ariadacapo (talk) 16:36, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

• support a merge The variant should be listed in the relevant section.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 19:07, 10 February 2020 (UTC) @Arnaud Lambert: rude.

Support: there isn't enough information to differentiate the varients at this stage. Anonymoustofu (talk) 00:24, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

• Support merge. Not enough information as of now for a separate article. We may end up with a second article for the military version in the future but not now. --McSly (talk) 21:19, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
• Merge not enough for a separate page at present. Mztourist (talk) 17:17, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.