 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Air Pegasus (India) page were merged into Air Pegasus on 14 March 2014. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Defunct?
editShould we convert the article to past tense? It has been two months since they suspended operations, and the last news articles on the airline were published over a month ago. — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 15:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Pinging recent editors @LeoFrank, @Adixit, @Trinidade, @Magentic Manifestations
- There aren't any official announcements on the resumption of flights. Given that all the aircraft of the airline have been de-registered, it might be a while since the resumption, if any, becomes a reality. It's best to put this in the past tense. — LeoFrank Talk 15:33, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, makes sense to put the article in past tense. Trinidade (talk) 05:10, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- Actually it is important to note this sentence in the History section: "Air Pegasus has agreed to pay back 50% of its dues to the lessors and will pay the remaining in instalments once flights resume." (source) We don't know the current status of this deal, but it may be good to wait another month or two for new information. I feel that sentence would seem out of place if the article were in past tense now. — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 22:08, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- We can mention the same with the date of the news and convert the article to past tense.Magentic Manifestations (talk) 09:21, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
- Actually it is important to note this sentence in the History section: "Air Pegasus has agreed to pay back 50% of its dues to the lessors and will pay the remaining in instalments once flights resume." (source) We don't know the current status of this deal, but it may be good to wait another month or two for new information. I feel that sentence would seem out of place if the article were in past tense now. — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 22:08, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, makes sense to put the article in past tense. Trinidade (talk) 05:10, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Agreed, also with the recent news that the DGCA has deregistered all the airline's aircraft, it is best to put the article in past tense. I have done so now. Thanks for everyone's input. — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 00:35, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- But isn't an airline become defunct only when the license is suspended permanently? As long as the licence is alive, they can start at any time. Amdmustafa (talk) 04:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- That's true, although it'll probably be suspended soon. I put the article back in present tense. — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 02:09, 18 October 2016 (UTC)