Talk:Air Defense Identification Zone (North America)

Possibly Misleading

From the Article:

An aircraft entering an ADIZ is required to radio its planned course, destination, and any additional details about its trip through the ADIZ to a higher authority, typically an air traffic controller. The aircraft must also be equipped with a radar transponder.

14 CFR Part 99.49 states "All airspace of the United States is designated as Defense Area", in which by definition the control of aircraft is required for reasons of national security.

---

These two statements are potentially misleading, as technically an aircraft is required to do nothing in an ADIZ in international airspace. Also, there are plenty of aircraft in U.S. airspace daily that are not controlled. Also, an air traffic controller might assist, but normally is not the controlling authority for an ADIZ.

I am searching for the correct way to post this with references before I add it to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.176.15.41 (talk) 16:09, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Unclear

The article states "The exact nature of the external ADIZ claim of the United States is unclear." without a source. Who is this unclear to? What source has documented that it is unclear? Toddst1 (talk) 20:46, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

  --I removed the line.  I agree it added nothing to the article.  If OP can come up with sources and other substantiating information it can go back.  Otherwise, it's just editorializing. Zibblezabble (talk) 12:19, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

---

Are you saying that the entire Mexican border, even including the Pacific around Baja California, was never included? Or for that matter, that Russian bombers coming in over Alaska would not have been included??! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.68.94.86 (talk) 09:14, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Needs a more global reach

China set to establish ADIZ over disputed East China Sea

Time to move back to the more general redirect? Hcobb (talk) 19:16, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Air Defense Identification Zone (North America). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110218033451/http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/civilaviation/publications/tp14371-rac-2-0-2599.htm to http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/civilaviation/publications/tp14371-rac-2-0-2599.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120919144314/http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/civilaviation/regserv/cars/part6-602-2436.htm to http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/civilaviation/regserv/cars/part6-602-2436.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:53, 25 January 2018 (UTC)