Talk:Air Assault Task Force

This page was erroneously marked for deletion as an "advertisement." I am a fan of the game and put up this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.179.132.47 (talk) 18:29, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Given that the language reads like an advertisement and closely paraphrases existing marketing language from the product's distributor, I think the assessment of "Advertisement" is accurate for this article in its present form, regardless of who put it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.60.161.98 (talk) 16:46, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Tags

Please fix the issues and then remove the tags. Try reading wp:notability for help establishing the notability of the subject. Dethlock99 (talk) 15:48, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Notability

Please add a ref to the review or other third party sources. It should talk about why this game is notable over others of its type. Notability needs to be both asserted in the article and referenced. Dethlock99 (talk) 16:24, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

I still don't see how this is notable. Dethlock99 (talk) 16:02, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Neutrality

Article reads like an advertisement or press release. It also contains a lot of subjective, uncorroborated assertions. ("Innovative", "hyper-realistic", "more visually appealing and playable", etc.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.60.161.98 (talk) 22:39, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Sources

Sources should be independent of the subject. Generally, blogs should be avoided. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dethlock99 (talk • contribs) 16:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

The company, two blogs, and two press releases are the sources. Dethlock99 (talk) 15:58, 19 November 2009 (UTC)