Talk:Ahmed Omaid Khpalwak

Request edit

{{Request edit}} Requested edit - the article incorrectly states Khpulwak killed by Taliban - see http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-14840998 for example for more recent reports that he was killed by American special forces while hiding in a bathroom and holding up his press card. Conflict of interest - none, I couldn't find a more appropriate template - I think this change needs to be made but can't do so myself.

Does not state anything about him being in a bathroom holding a press card. He conducted actions similar to what a suicide bomber would do when he reached to show his press card to US Soldiers. With an Afghan name and Afghan looking, it wouldn't be hard to perceive him as part of the insurgency just after an attack when he looks like the Taliban (Ethnically) Kuname (talk) 21:42, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Please could you state *exactly* what you think should be changed - such as, "XXX should change to YYY" - and give references. I can't see what needs changing - or, maybe, it has already been changed? The current version says, Khpulwak was killed by American ISAF troops on July 28, 2011, in Tarin Kowt, Afghanistan, when Taliban insurgents attacked government facilities - is that OK?  Chzz  ►  02:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Feedback

You have great details about your journalist's work. I am surprised and impressed that you were able to find some of his articles. Great research! You have sources for all of your information, which is really good. Pjweinzapf (talk) 02:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

think you should work on separating your information into the format that Crtew gave us. When you split it up into sections like "Death," "context," "Impact," "Reactions," "Career," and "Personal" it is easier for others to read and find the information that they are looking for. These sections are also seen in almost all other Wikipedia articles. You give good information. For example, you mention and list the two previous reporters who died in Afghanistan, but this might be overlooked because it is not in the "impact section." Also, rather than saying that Abdul Samad Roohani was killed "three years ago" you might want to put the exact year because this article will be on wikipedia for many years and that reference to "three years ago" will not always be accurate. I hope this information helps you! You have good information, but it just needs to be organized a bit better. Pjweinzapf (talk) 02:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Balmung576 - Right now the notability that would appear in the article's lead is buried. I'm in agreement with Pjwienzapf that you need to organize and give shape to the material. The article reads haphazardly. Guide the reader. As another commenter notes above, important details about his death are missing. Look at the email I sent you for a pointers about notability and important details. I would suggest a Lexis-Nexis search for more information about his death. You'll also want to explore information about context, such as NATO's struggle with the Taliban/terrorists in this region. Create links to other parts of Wikipedia, too. You should be able to identify some more information that readers may want to explore! I added an external link I found. Crtew (talk) 20:20, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Part of the problem is that there were two version of his death. One version was given in the aftermath. The other version came out after the NATO report was released. So you need to clarify this confusion. I changed "when" to "after" in one instance because it was a subtle error of fact, in light of the report that confirmed how he had died. Crtew (talk) 20:31, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

I added that external link. Take a look at some of his stories. That may be of interest to what you want to convey about his career. But avoid "original research" per Wikipedia culture. Crtew (talk) 20:31, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

What reactions did you find? Crtew (talk) 20:56, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Ahmad Omaid Khpalwak of Pajhwok Afghan News.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Ahmad Omaid Khpalwak of Pajhwok Afghan News.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Ahmad Omaid Khpalwak of Pajhwok Afghan News.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:17, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ahmed Omaid Khpalwak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111025195141/http://www.nai.org.af/en to http://www.nai.org.af/en

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:23, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Southern Indiana supported by WikiProject Journalism and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:41, 2 January 2023 (UTC)