Talk:Ahmadzai (Ghilji clan)

This article is a total mess

Either fix it or delete it. 2601:642:4102:BC60:65ED:2373:BDFA:555C (talk) 09:31, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Yes, but Wikipedia is a self-serve place. I have added a good source, feel free to change the article into a better one. Викидим (talk) 17:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Ahmadzai trib

Ahmadzai was nine 9 son's who names are 1)yahiya.yahiyakhil (2)mussa.mussakhil (3) essa.essakhil (4)maruf.marupkhil (5)jabar.jabarkhil(6) Aladen.aladenkhil (7) brim.brimkhil (8) zandde.zanddekhil (9) babukar.babukarkhil . Ahmadzai divided by 9 trib .remember Afghanistan ex president ashraf ghani ahmadzai belong to mussakhil trib. and Afghanistan ex president najeeb ullah and alhaj tako khan taghar ahmadzai belong to yahiyakhil trib . And ex parliamentarian zahir qadeer family belong to jabarkhil trib . 103.255.6.70 (talk) 22:28, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Removal of cn tags

@Noorullah21:: WP:TAGBOMB is an essay and certainly cannot override the WP:V. So I am going with the recommendations of the essay "Improve it yourself" and removing all very strange an un-encyclopedic claims that used to be marked with {{cn}}: for many months, no source was provided. Please note that your reversal of my revert goes against the basics of WP:CONS, it would have made sense after my reversal to start a discussion here. In any case, the {{cn}} were placed due to some claims being WP:EXCEPTIONAL (like "There are some rules which no one can break and if they took responsibility they mean it"). Викидим (talk) 02:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

You don't understand. @Викидим

You don't mass tag bomb an entire wikipedia page in every line with "citation needed", you simply add a template [at the top], or break it down. What you're doing is considered TAGBOMBING, which can result in a block after being asked to stop; "...Editors who engage in tag bombing after being asked to stop may be blocked from editing Wikipedia." -- See WP:OVERTAG. Noorullah (talk) 04:37, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

The tags were not "vague", they indicated the particular issues with the text. The problems were very obvious (unusual and strange claims with no sources whatsoever, see an exaple above), so IMHO OVERTAG did not apply. In any case, there is hopefully no issue now, so we can continue discussing the text of the article. Викидим (talk) 05:37, 4 October 2024 (UTC)