Untitled

edit
Close strange discussion. Does not appear to be constructive.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

2 Chronicles 22 indicates that Ahaziah was 42 when he gained the throne, but the preceding chapter notes that his father and predecessor Jehoram became king at age 32 and reigned for eight years (thus dying at age 40). This would make Ahaziah two years older than his father. Kings has Ahaziah becoming king at age 20, and LXX (either in Kings or Chronicles) has him 22. One commentator (possibly the Anchor Bible) posits that the Masoretic editor of Chronicles combined (added) the two traditions of Ahaziah's age. (This discrepancy is reported as referring to Ahaziah of Israel, on the page fo that name.)Opaanderson 18:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply


What? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.23.214.212 (talk) 01:48, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Is this really a discussion for the talk page? If it is, you may reopen it. Unless you specify your meaning, I will close it. 68.100.116.118 (talk) 00:06, 13 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ahaziah of Judah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:30, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ahaziah of Judah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:38, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Why would the same person, for the same text, without any notice, use two different calendars?

edit

This whole idea seems moronic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:AB88:370C:1480:354A:AA5E:5B12:AF43 (talk) 10:31, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply