Talk:Agricultural and Marketing Research and Development Trust

Agriculture Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Speedy deletion? edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This was added within seconds of me completing the first draft so I am not sure how anyone could have formed the view that AGMARDT wasn't important. AGMARDT is a significant funder of primary sector research in New Zealand and I think its history as a successor to the phosphate money arising from the mining of Pacific Island nations is interesting in and of itself.

The trust is a New Zealand crown entity and therefore an organ of state. For me the existing stub is a work in progress.

Gacole (talk) 03:46, 10 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Organs of state are not inherently notable; I've worked for several which have no business having articles in Wikipedia. Make your case by providing solid links to impartial third parties (not to government websites). --Orange Mike | Talk 03:57, 10 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

References edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

See http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&client=firefox-a&q=%22Agricultural+and+Marketing+Research+and+Development+Trust%22&btnG=Search for a list of articles which mention (usually as a funder) the trust.

See http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/4313428a3600.html for an article about a project financed in part by the trust. --Eastmain (talk) 03:55, 10 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Agricultural and Marketing Research and Development Trust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:29, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic