Talk:Age of consent reform in Canada

Latest comment: 12 years ago by 201.220.15.68 in topic recent edit #2

Re: Beckham edit

The article indicates that Beckham had sex with a 14 year old boy. It then states that because the boy consented, no rape charges could be made. I've read the pre-2008 law, and though it indicated that consent for sex can be given by 14 year olds, it also stated that one could not consent to anal sex until they were 18. Anyone know why that subsection of the law in question wasn't explored? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.27.142.106 (talk) 13:33, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

recent edit edit

please specify if the conditions described in the sentence I removed were present before or after the criminal act, or both. I do not think the prev version was clear about this chronology. thank you. S*K*A*K*K 16:46, 23 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

recent edit #2 edit

I count 6 criticisms of the legislation, and no endorsements. Surely there were, in a country of 31 million people, groups and organizations that supported the legislation? Why is there not a section on endorsements or support of the legislation? The neutrality of this article is in sharp disrepute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.220.15.68 (talk) 20:52, 22 September 2011 (UTC)Reply