Talk:Age of Consent (album)

Fair use rationale for Image:Age of Consent (Virgin Steele album).jpg

Image:Age of Consent (Virgin Steele album).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:41, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:19, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Age of Consent (Virgin Steele album) → Age of Consent (album) — According to the standards specified for Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums the qualifier (album) should be sufficient as there is no page for other albums with that exact name (The Bronski Beat album is named The Age of Consent). Zaister (talk) 19:14, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

• Support per WP:PRECISION. Jenks24 (talk) 03:55, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
• Support Lewismaster (talk) 11:36, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
• Oppose This nomination confuses formal titling with common usage.
  Per WP:PRECISION, dabs should be short, but since the definite article is not normally included in a title it may commonly omitted from the titles where it does formally belong. So a reader looking for the Bronski beat album may quite reasonably look for "Age of Consent" rather than "The Age of Consent". As a result, the title "Age of Consent (album)" may reasonably be read to refer to either the VS album or the BB album, and the proposed renaming would breach WP:PRECISION by not being as precise as necessary. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:33, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Age of Consent (Virgin Steele album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081121192519/http://www.revelationz.net/index.asp?ID=316 to http://www.revelationz.net/index.asp?ID=316

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:43, 27 June 2017 (UTC)