Talk:Agaja

Latest comment: 11 years ago by AbstractIllusions in topic Move and Major Edits

Move and Major Edits edit

The original for this article had good information, but no sources and it was very incomplete. I added top-flight sources and cleaned up some aspects. The following changes are relevant: 1. I moved the page. Agaja is the preferred usage, although some old Encyclopedias do use Agadja, the scholarly usage is clear. See: any Law source, or Bay, or Encyclopedia of the Middle Passage. Agaja is heavily preferred. 2. Debate in historians: There is an active discussion over the past 30 years about whether Agaja was active in the slave trade hesitantly or whether he was active. I tried to reflect and write the (very important it turns out) debate. But more improvement by experts could help. 3. The history is not clear on key points. I tried to reflect this with mentions of disputed parts. When it wasn't clear, I used Bay's history as a key default position.

Don't like these changes? Let's talk it out. AbstractIllusions (talk) 18:59, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply