Talk:Aeta people

Latest comment: 1 year ago by A11w1ss3nd in topic Old man photo

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 2 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yusikate.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:29, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ati (tribe) edit

Who included the Ati tribe of Panay in this section? I think it is kinda an insult to them being included here since their culture is more related to the Bisaya rather than to the Sambalic culture of the Aetas of Zambales in Luzon.23prootie 08:56, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

"related groups" info removed from infobox edit

For dedicated editors of this page: The "Related Groups" info was removed from all {{Infobox Ethnic group}} infoboxes. Comments may be left on the Ethnic groups talk page. Ling.Nut 21:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

autonomy or reservation edit

Do they have autonomy or reservation?--Kaiyr (talk) 08:57, 14 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Number edit

How many Aeta people are there?--Kaiyr (talk) 19:39, 28 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aeta people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

DNA edit

What about DNA?--Kaiyr (talk) 10:17, 23 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please update with: "Philippine Ayta possess the highest level of Denisovan ancestry in the world" edit

I think it would be good to add some short info about this study's findings to the article. It's currently featured in 2021 in science like so:

Scientists report that the Ayta people in the Philippines have the highest level of Denisovan ancestry in the world and describe the related genetic history in the region.[1][2]

This is also relevant to what @Kaiyr: asked about above.

--Prototyperspective (talk) 20:15, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ "An Indigenous people in the Philippines have the most Denisovan DNA". Science News. 12 August 2021. Retrieved 22 September 2021.
  2. ^ Larena, Maximilian; McKenna, James; Sanchez-Quinto, Federico; Bernhardsson, Carolina; Ebeo, Carlo; Reyes, Rebecca; Casel, Ophelia; Huang, Jin-Yuan; Hagada, Kim Pullupul; Guilay, Dennis; Reyes, Jennelyn; Allian, Fatima Pir; Mori, Virgilio; Azarcon, Lahaina Sue; Manera, Alma; Terando, Celito; Jamero, Lucio; Sireg, Gauden; Manginsay-Tremedal, Renefe; Labos, Maria Shiela; Vilar, Richard Dian; Latiph, Acram; Saway, Rodelio Linsahay; Marte, Erwin; Magbanua, Pablito; Morales, Amor; Java, Ismael; Reveche, Rudy; Barrios, Becky; Burton, Erlinda; Salon, Jesus Christopher; Kels, Ma Junaliah Tuazon; Albano, Adrian; Cruz-Angeles, Rose Beatrix; Molanida, Edison; Granehäll, Lena; Vicente, Mário; Edlund, Hanna; Loo, Jun-Hun; Trejaut, Jean; Ho, Simon Y. W.; Reid, Lawrence; Lambeck, Kurt; Malmström, Helena; Schlebusch, Carina; Endicott, Phillip; Jakobsson, Mattias (12 August 2021). "Philippine Ayta possess the highest level of Denisovan ancestry in the world". Current Biology. 0 (0). doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.022. ISSN 0960-9822.
I have two issues with this: 1. The statement is only true for a subset of the Aeta people. The study indeed finds the highest level of Denisovan ancestry among the Magbukun, but for all other Aeta groups, it is approximately at the same level or lower than the mean level for Australian or Papuan peoples. 2. Genetic information in articles about ethnic groups should be based on high-quality secondary sources. Larena et al. (2021) undoubtedly is good scholarship, but it is still a study with presents primary research results. I'd rather wait for coverage in a secondary source before we include it here. –Austronesier (talk) 15:46, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
This is probably a sign it's time to have a separate wiki entry for the Magbukun people. - Batongmalake (talk) 03:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Old man photo edit

File:JfSanJuan9974SantaAnaPampangafvf 03.JPG reads: "Mount Arayat watching its oldest Aeta or [!] native". I am not English native but it sounds that it is not sure that he is Aeta, isn't it? A11w1ss3nd (talk) 19:22, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply