Talk:Adult film industry regulations

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

This was an interesting page I really didn't think of and how it's regulated. maybe if there was a page you could link the cases and scandels to yours! nice jobAc7958 (talk) 02:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

This is basically a paraphrasing of the article found at http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1892037. Maybe it should all be moved to a section in the main pornography article. -- 140.233.204.45 (talk) 02:58, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Was there much call for concern before AIM was started in 1998? Or did the industry kind of turn a blind eye. So far it looks good but you just have to elaborate on certain sections and add more.Drohn141 (talk) 13:56, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I think you've done a great job, but I also agree it could use more information. The last two sections end with "etc.." I don't know if you planned on adding more, but if you didn't, I believe you should. Also, maybe you can talk about the different types of films made in the Adult Film industry, and how some are very contraversial, such as the whole "child porn" and "rape" aspects of pornography. Good job :) --Lhomol (talk)

It’s crazy to think about how big this industry is and how many different things you can do to expand it. One thing I was wondering about as I read the article was can a performer sue the industry if a shoot does not go as planned, for example if a rape scene gets out of hand and goes beyond what actor/actress agreed to. One other little thing is you may want to check your bareback link because when I clicked on it, it looked like horseback riding.. I’m not sure if that’s what it is supposed to be or not.--Rhultgren (talk) 18:11, 30 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

this was a very interesting page,it could use a little bit more information. overall it seems pretty good. To clarify one of the questions above, pornography has become a very professional business, it would be very rare that a scene would get out of hand because porn is for the most part scripted and there are numerous people around during shoots. You also have to remember that this is their profession so both parties try their best to be as professional as possible. (wrestler07) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.246.3.2 (talk) 21:36, 30 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adult film industry regulations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Adult film industry regulations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply