This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
This article is part of WikiProject Marine life, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on marine life. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles
Other: Add {{Portal|Marine life}} to related articles
A fact from Adriatic sturgeon appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 February 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that although it is possible that the Adriatic sturgeon is extinct in the wild, a large specimen was caught in the River Po in 2015?
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The headline to this on the main page makes it seem as if someone caught the fish and scientists verified it. Not the case at all. A fisherman caught and released the fish, posted photographs, and, later, a biologist commented about what it might mean. This information should be presented as it is. The Red List page sufficiently discusses that cobice sturgeon being caught today are probably released fish, not the offspring of either the native population or newly released fish spawning without making this sentence appear to be tied to something other than a posting anyone can make. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:380:545A:DB9C:FD90:6AEF:F418:6EEE (talk) 20:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
