Talk:Adobe Streamline

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Old discussion

edit

What version was the last version of Adobe Streamline? Robert Elliott 03:32, 27 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

If I remember correctly, I had a version 4.0 Tryout of the program (as well as an illustrator 7 tryout and some 3d tryout from adobe) Colinstu 04:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I heard somewhere the Adobe wasn't allowed to incorporate streamline into another product for 10 years or something, based on their agreement when they originally bought streamline, but that CS2's Live Trace feature is the (now-allowed) inclusion of streamline IP into Illustrator. I don't remember where I read this, but it seemed like a legitimate source. If this is true, that info should be tracked down and added to this page. Streamline, and Live Trace, are truly the best way to vectorize raster graphics. Leaps and bounds ahead of any other product I've seen. --18.85.46.22 20:46, 12 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Assignment discussion

edit

I looked at the revision history for the Photoshop and Illustrator articles and contacted some of the editors on their talk pages. Hopefully some give this page a visit and can give some advice. JawS001313 (talk) 01:48, 30 September 2012 (UTC)Reply


Remember to update information on the draft page before making it live Jet ltp (talk) 14:38, 1 October 2012 (UTC)Reply


Spent some time looking for evidence that CS2's Live Trace feature is the now-allowed inclusion of streamline IP into Illustrator (after the 10 year agreement User 18.85.46.22|18.85.46.22 described) but no articles I found delineated this. Agreed on the screenshot being extremely important. bnd24 (talk) 11:10, 28 September 2012 (UTC)Reply


We need a screenshot of the software in order to provide a picture (I consider pictures to be extremely important). Can someone get a hold of the software, install it, and take one? JawS001313 (talk) 07:50, 25 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Screenshot

edit

For a screenshot of the software, I recommend first investigating the Wikimedia commons for a suitable image. if none can be found, a trial of streamline is available for mac on softpedia or windows at cnet download center. I hope this helps :D NotinREALITY 05:44, 30 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Suggestions

edit

Hello. I was asked to provide some suggestions for improvement by JawS001313 (talk · contribs).

  1. Add more context to the article. Currently for someone unfamiliar with the subject matter it's difficult to discern what exactly the purpose of the application was. I would provide some examples of why someone would have used Adobe Streamline.
  2. Provide more details as to the current program that has replaced the functionality of Streamline.
  3. Under the features heading it only lists those that were "new to version 4.0." This begs the question what features existed prior to version 4.0?
  4. Try to provide some more references to independent and reliable sources to prove its notability and make the article more reliable. Currently the links to Adobe's own website do not meet the Wikipedia's WP:IRS requirements.
  5. If you need a screenshot, you may want to try flickr. If you see a suitable image, check to make sure it has been released under a free license (i.e. CC-BY=SA, CC-BY, GNU or public domain) before uploading to Wikipedia. It would still be considered fair use due to Adobe's inherent copyright, so couldn't be uploaded to Commons. —JmaJeremy 20:53, 30 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

This is a good start. Add more references (I see unreferenced paragraphs) and you can nominate your work at WP:DYK for front page exposure. Note that this nom has to be done within five days of the move (so, within five days of today). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:58, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Adobe Streamline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:44, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adobe Streamline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:47, 27 June 2017 (UTC)Reply