Talk:Addington Palace

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Civil Partnerships

edit

From the article:

It is used extensively for weddings and since 21 December 2005 for civil partnerships...

I think most open-minded people agree that the new laws with respect to “civil partnerships” are forward thinking. But it is clearly the same thing as a wedding and weddings are already noted. It's inclusion is really just "politically correct speak", and redundant. I’m removing it not because I’m a homophobe (I’m not), but because it is, in the context of the wording, a POV. If wikipeadia readers want to beat the drum about civil partnerships, there maybe some place here to do it, but this ain't it. Jake b 18:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Addington Palace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:56, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply