Talk:Adam Zachary Newton
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Paul A in topic Original research
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notability
edittype his name into JSTOR or google books (use more than one spelling to pull up multiple references) and notability is clear American Clio (talk) 21:11, 24 February 2008 (UTC) American Clio
Original research
editAdam Zachary Newton is widely cited on the subject of how readers engage with text.[1][2][3][4][5]
- ^ Long, Elizabeth. Book Clubs: Women and the Uses of Reading in Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003. ISBN 0-226-49261-3
- ^ Karnicky, J. (2007). Contemporary fiction and the ethics of modern culture. New York, N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-4039-7760-1
- ^ Knellwolf, C., Norris, C., & Osborn, J. (2001). The Cambridge history of literary criticism. Vol. 9, Twentieth-century historical, philosophical and psychological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 380 ISBN 0-521-30014-2
- ^ Wolfreys, J. (2002). Introducing criticism at the 21st century. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, p. 114 ISBN 0-585-44340-8
- ^ Davis, T. F., & Womack, K. (2001). Mapping the ethical turn: a reader in ethics, culture, and literary theory. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, p. 5 ISBN 0-8139-2055-8
I'm pulling this sentence out of the article because I think it goes against Wikipedia's rules on original research. If you want to say that Newton is widely cited, the correct procedure is to cite a published study showing that, not to collect citations yourself. —Paul A (talk) 02:59, 15 September 2011 (UTC)