Talk:Adam Farley

Latest comment: 2 years ago by AndyTheGrump in topic Semi-protected edit request on 19 May 2022

Apparent conflict of interest edit

A substantial part of the editing of this article has been by an editor who claims to be the article subject[1] under the usernames AFarley12 and Silvershamrock123.[2]. NebY (talk) 15:16, 13 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adam Farley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adam Farley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 19 May 2022 edit

Hi, I would like to request that you remove the paragraph stating that Adam Farley had played in one of the games he bet on. He never played in any of the games and this was a mistake and he doesn’t deserve for this to follow him around for the rest of his life and it could impact his future. 193.164.120.138 (talk) 07:36, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: seems to be sourced https://www.pitchero.com/clubs/marine/news/press-release-fa-issue-charges-on-betting-73213.html Cannolis (talk) 08:01, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
And see the Liverpool Echo, which confirms the details relating to the ban. [3]. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:44, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Page deletion edit

Can I propose that this page is deleted. He hasn’t played at any level for over 12 years and isn’t a relevant person. The sourced information regarding betting is wrong and could have a huge impact on the rest of his life. Statto1950 (talk) 14:02, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

given that you are blocked from editing the article page, you'd need to find someone willing to do so on your behalf - see Wikipedia:Deletion policy and Wikipedia:Deletion process for more details on ways to propose deletion. You should note however that 'not having played for 12 years' isn't likely to be seen as a valid argument for deletion - we have articles on professional footballers who died over a hundred years ago (see e.g. Fergus Suter). This is an encyclopaedia, and topics which meet our notability requirements are expected to remain notable.
As for 'sourced information' being wrong, we'd need a source for that. Or at minimum, a better reason to remove it than mere assertions that it is wrong. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:41, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply