Talk:Acute inhalation injury

I added the NPOV tag because I think this is not just an article about Acute inhalation injury but also makes a political case. Please discuss. Biscuittin (talk) 14:29, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

What is the purpose of this disconnected info on one page, and who made it? Is it some sort of ad to start a national agency about acute inhalation in association with terrorism? It does not make sense.AtomAnt (talk) 17:24, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

This is a very comprehensive enumeration of ALL of the possible causes of Acute Inhalation Injury, their effects, and possible treatments. Sure, simple household exposure and perhaps forest fires (in western US) are the most likely to cause ordinary exposure, but I commend the author for presenting information about all possible toxic inhalants and exposure environments for readers. I see a scientific, not political intent. BVinCA (talk) 18:27, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

In keeping with the scientific presentation of information I cleaned up the intro. To my knowledge the use of gases in a bioterrorism related event has not occurred yet so it is merely speculative and has been removed as well as the discussion of an urgent need to develop new techniques for respiratory assistance. To me this bit actually sounded like someone was trying to supplement a grant proposal by ensuring places other than their grant application also mentioned an urgent need for additional procedures. Methylated603 (talk) 16:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC)