Talk:Actually existing capitalism/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
This article needs serious work
I agree that this article reflects bias. This article also indicates that the author has a very surface based understanding of economics. Indeed what the author listed as causes of the 1929 Crash and the 2007 financial crisis is outright false and should be removed because of how blatantly wrong these entries are.
The author does have a few sources, but they are not very respectable and creditable sources. In short the sources need serious work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.241.224.173 (talk) 19:31, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
POV
This page is ridiculously POV. Clearly promoting a particular angle. But with lots of citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.132.96.36 (talk) 14:49, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
burn this whole article. 70.162.140.74 (talk) 01:05, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
i agree. at the very least, everything after the first paragraph should be deleted, because it is all just a defense of ideological capitalism, and has absolutely nothing to do with the concept of "actually existing capitalism". Benjamin5152414 (talk) 02:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
POV Improvements
I've improved the article's POV problems, and also removed some redundant content / grammatical errors. It is a bit small, however. TheTiksiBranch (talk) 17:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)