Talk:Activate Learning
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
One page for each campus?
editAs there are four campuses in Oxford and Cherwell Valley College - one in Oxford City Centre, one in Blackbird Leys, one in Banbury, and one in Bicester - would it be better to create an article about these four campuses instead of each individual campus? Manm hk 11:43, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved by Coreyemotela. Trout to them for not moving the talk page. Anyway, it's all cleaned up now. --BDD (talk) 17:44, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Oxford and Cherwell Valley College → Activate Learning – Since OCVC is now called Activate Learning, could someone please move it to a new page named Activate learning? Samluke132 (talk) 13:40, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- I moved it. Coreyemotela (talk) 21:03, 6 May 2014 (UTC).
- So I see, and now others will need to clean up after you. There was no valid raionale for the move (see WP:AT and WP:official names), you haven't moved the talk page (and now I've innocently created one at its target) and you haven't closed the RM. Please read Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions, and if you're not prepared to close the RM, please don't move a page under a current RM. But in this case it's possible that the article will (again) be deleted anyway. Andrewa (talk) 00:57, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Notability
editThis article currently [1] makes no claim as to the notability of its topic, the only references are the organisation's own websites, and it reads like an advertisement.
It has been speedy deleted once, and the content both before and since that deletion is largely (perhaps entirely) from single use accounts, presumably associated with the institution.
I suspect it should now go to AfD. Interested in other views. Andrewa (talk) 00:32, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because it appears to be a valid article subject of a group of further education colleges. --Philafrenzy (talk) 18:25, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Activate Learning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140524081651/https://www.brookes.ac.uk/studying-at-brookes/courses/foundation-degrees-and-partnership-courses/prospective-students/where-and-what-can-i-study/reading-college/ to https://www.brookes.ac.uk/studying-at-brookes/courses/foundation-degrees-and-partnership-courses/prospective-students/where-and-what-can-i-study/reading-college/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:17, 3 October 2016 (UTC)