Talk:Action of 9 November 1822/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Jim Sweeney in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 02:26, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comments

edit
  1. Buccaneer is slightly different from pirate can I suggest you stay with pirate
  2. despite the lack of wind, using its sweeps - are sweeps oars clarification required for us non nautical types

--Jim Sweeney (talk) 02:56, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

    1. I believe i have fixed both these issues.XavierGreen (talk) 07:52, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply