Talk:Acrantophis madagascariensis

Move proposal

Would there be any objections if this article were to be moved to it's current scientific name? According to the taxonomy available through ITIS, which has been applied to the rest of this series, the name it should then be moved to is Boa madagascariensis. --Jwinius (talk) 17:59, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Would you provide some references to current research to justify the move? The ITIS lists it traditionally as a Boa indeed (based on McDiarmid et al, 1999), but other sources, eg [1] name it Acrantophis. As far as I understand, it is not closely related to the South American Boa, and should be treated as such - or else, is there some newer phylogeny available that refutes the results of Vences et al., 2001 (Copeia, 2001(4), pp. 1151–1154), or Noonan et al. (Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40 (2006) 347–358)? Kaarel (talk) 14:07, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

boa

the boa is very rare by the time 8 year old child

are about 40 they will be extinct wich is very sad.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.169.145.44 (talk) 06:34, 25 March 2010 (UTC) 

I Think these creatures are VERY interesting !!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.153.125.40 (talk) 16:14, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Acrantophis madagascariensis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080826044449/http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/ to http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:12, 26 June 2017 (UTC)