Talk:Acoustic attenuation

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Acoustics Taskforce.

Graph

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This needs one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.237.150.151 (talk) 18:49, 26 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Frequency dependent attenuation rate problem

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I am no expert but this part seems incorrect.

"Acoustic attenuation in water is frequency-squared dependent, namely $\eta =2$ . Acoustic attenuation in many metals and crystalline materials is frequency-independent, namely $\eta =1$ .^[1]"

$\eta =1$ means the characteristic length is $1/\alpha _{0}\omega$ , yet the source (which seems to have incorrect syntax as well) claims it's frequency independent. Someone who knows this check if the statement is valid. 59.115.129.173 (talk) 18:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

References

^ {{Knopoff, L. Rev. Geophys.|title = Q|year 1964| 2, 625–660| >

Add topic

[Knopoff,_L.-1] {{Knopoff, L. Rev. Geophys.|title = Q|year 1964| 2, 625–660| >

[1]